LOT 111
上一件
下一件
THE MASTER OF THE TURIN ADORATION (ACTIVE BRUGES AND GENOA? 1490-1520) The Emperor Heraclius bearing the True Cross, denied entry to Jerusalem by an angel
作品估价:GBP 30,000 - 50,000
货币换算
成交状态:落槌价GBP 登录后查看
买家佣金拍卖企业在落槌价的基础上收取买家佣金
26%
图录号:
111
拍品名称:
THE MASTER OF THE TURIN ADORATION (ACTIVE BRUGES AND GENOA? 1490-1520) The Emperor Heraclius bearing the True Cross, denied entry to Jerusalem by an angel
拍品描述:
THE MASTER OF THE TURIN ADORATION (ACTIVE BRUGES AND GENOA? 1490-1520) The Emperor Heraclius bearing the True Cross, denied entry to Jerusalem by an angel oil on panel 42 ¼ x 36 in. (107.3 x 91.5 cm.) with coat-of-arms (lower right)In a private aristocratic collection, near Turin, from at least the 19th century, and by descent to the seller at the following, Anonymous sale [The Property of a Gentleman]; Christie's, London, 7 December 2007, lot 172, when acquired by the present owner.M.C. Galassi, ‘Revising Friedländer: The ‘Underdrawing Connoisseurship’ and the Master of the Turin Adoration’, Underdrawing and Technology in Painting. Symposia, XIX, September 2018, pp. 102 and 110, under note 17.This intriguing panel is given to The Master of the Turin Adoration, a hand first named by Max Friedländer in 1927 ('Drei Niederländische Maler in Genua', Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst, XVI, Leipzig, 1927-8, pp. 273-9) after an altarpiece of The Adoration of the Magi in the Galleria Sabauda, Turin (inv. no. 309). That, he suggested, was part of a polyptych that also included two panels of the same height, depicting The Legends of Saints Agnes and Catherine, in the Musée des Beaux-Arts, Strasbourg (subsequently destroyed by fire in 1947). Godfridus Hoogewerff in 1935 rejected that reconstruction, but accepted the attribution, adding to the group another two panels of the same subject as the Strasbourg pictures in the Palazzo Ex-Reale, Genoa. He suggested convincingly that the Master was an artist working under the influence of Gerard David and probably based in Genoa ( Vlaamsche Kunst en Italiaansche Renaissance, Mechelen and Antwerp, 1935, pp. 99-100). The influence of Netherlandish art on Italy in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries is extremely well documented and dates back to as early as the 1430s, perhaps most famously with the commission of Van Eyck's Annunciation triptych by Battista Lomellino. By Gerard David's time, there was a long-established and very considerable trade in paintings exported from the region to Italy, and particularly to Genoa. Within that trade, pictures from Bruges seem to have had a particularly high standing - presumably because of its historical position. The number of works and commissions from the port city has led scholars to posit a community of northern artists active there (e.g. Hoogewerff, 'Pittori fiamminghi in Liguria nel secolo XVI (Gherardo David, Giovanni Provost, Joos van der Beke, Giovanni Massys)', Commentari, 12, pp. 176-94). The Master of the Turin Adoration is one of the hands that has been suggested as belonging to that hypothetical group. The present picture, is attributed to him on the basis of its close similarities with others of the Master's given oeuvre. Clearly Davidian in its influences (for example the figural type of the Emperor), it shares with the Turin Adoration and the Christ carrying the Cross by the Master in the John G. Johnson Collection, Philadelphia, the same rather distinctive horses, with their gimlet eyes, pronounced fetlocks, arched necks, mannered mouths biting the reins, and, most idiosyncratically and common to all three works, the centre parting of the crest of the mane. In addition the slightly unusual construction of the horse turned to look straight out of the picture, with the rider's left hand held on the right of the horse's neck, holding the reins, recurs in both this and the Philadelphia pictures. Furthermore, both pictures share a commonly distinctive architectural format, with pronounced vertical lines and high, narrow arches, a feature evident also in the Genoa panels, whilst the figural type in the present right foreground, with elongated legs and quite hard features, recurs throughout the Master's work. The subject matter is taken from the story of the Discovery of the True Cross, a medieval legend that existed in a number of different sources, tracing the history of Christ's Cross from the Garden of Eden down to the time of the Emperor Heraclius (c. 575-641). The present scene shows Heraclius returning from his decisively successful campaign of 627 against the Sassanid Emperor Chosroes (Khosrau II), who had invaded the Empire in 613-4, capturing Jerusalem and seizing a fragment of the True Cross amongst other Christian relics kept there. The legend held that, as Heraclius returned in victorious procession to Jerusalem with the fragment of the True Cross (here, as was conventionally the case in art, depicted as the entire Cross), an angel appeared over the city walls, forbidding him entry through the gate (which turned into solid stone) and reminding him of the contrasting humility of Christ's entry into the city. Humbled, the Emperor dismounted and either carried the relic on foot or mounted on an ass, whereupon the wall turned back to a gate. Interestingly, a second panel depicting this final episode and bearing the same coat-of-arms appeared at auction in 2018 (Sotheby’s, London, 6 December 2018, lot 102). The coat-of-arms was there identified as those of Janus von Eberstädt, of Saxony, which can be discounted, as his seal features three knives in a different arrangement. It is more likely that the coat belonged to a guild, perhaps a butchers' guild, presumably represented by the action of the figure at lower right, who is carving meat.